> For PU it's the other way around.
Hmm, tenses used as tcita have confused me for this reason. So, as a
followup question, {broda pu lo nu brode} means "broda and then brode" or
"broda but first brode"? Does PU when used as a tcita mark the main bridi
or the following sumti and what is it's "origin"?
2010/3/21 Jorge Llambías <[email protected]>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:25 AM, Luke Bergen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I've been perusing the CLL looking for an answer but haven't found a very
> > clear one so I'll ask here. Does {broda .imu'ibo brode} mean "broda
> > therefore (motivationally) brode" or "broda because of (motivationally)
> > brode"?
>
> The latter. It is roughly equivalent to "broda mu'i lo nu brode".
>
> > Same question for PU.
>
> For PU it's the other way around. "broda .ibabo brode" roughly means
> "brode ba lo nu broda".
>
> > Basically this use of {bo} confuses me in
> > just about every way.
>
> That's understandable, because the conventions for tags are not as
> consistent as they should have been.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
>
>
>
