* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:13:19PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> >
> > here is the results from a partial mbox of ny.pm messages, it is not
> > that complete an mbox, but it does indicate that we are simply not
> > doing or best to take over NY.pm
>
> You know, I've been meaning to ask...
>
> Why in the world would you *want* to take over NY.pm???
>
Because you've lost your way, there was a time that no one would ever
have to ask questions such as ...
"Hmmm, is talking about beer off-topic or on-topic here?"
- John Kominetz, 8/6/2001
Where did you go wrong? It used to be that London.pm could regard
NY.pm as its sister group (i would say brother, but you could never
handle your booze) shining brightly in the dark sky of Perl Monger
groups that talked about Perl. Whats next, NY.pm the educational
cooperative? *shudder*
;-)
--
Greg McCarroll http://217.34.97.146/~gem/
