On Jun 09, David Cantrell wrote:
> So yes, the only reason for not allowing me to use it is incompetence on
> the part of whichever civil 'servants' were in charge of implementing it.

Out of interest, does anyone know if it's done "in-house" or contracted out?
(I strongly suspect the latter)

> This incompetence is further manifested in their choice of platform.
> even if I *could* use it, I wouldn't use it anyway, as I do not have
> sufficient confidence in the integrity of the server for such important
> information as my (eg) medical and tax data.

Err, why? What do you know about its implementation as opposed to any other
government website?

| Mark Hynes              [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
| "What are you trying to incinerate?" |

Reply via email to