> Err... Twice as fast is still twice as fast when it's running on a
> processor that's twice as fast as it would have been. I now can't
> remember where I read a fascinating piece on the value of more
> efficient algorithms as computers got faster. But it was worth
> reading. It was by that guy. Y'know, the guy who wrote that paper. 

New Scientist article, IIRC.

-- 
print "\n",map{my$a="\n"if(length$_>6);' 'x(36-length($_)/2)."$_\n$a"} (
   Name  => 'Mark Fowler',        Title => 'Technology Developer'      ,
   Firm  => 'Profero Ltd',        Web   => 'http://www.profero.com/'   ,
   Email => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',   Phone => '+44 (0) 20 7700 9960'      )





Reply via email to