* Mark Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Err... Twice as fast is still twice as fast when it's running on a
> > processor that's twice as fast as it would have been. I now can't
> > remember where I read a fascinating piece on the value of more
> > efficient algorithms as computers got faster. But it was worth
> > reading. It was by that guy. Y'know, the guy who wrote that paper. 
> 

ah, but its half the difference and thats whats important in this context,
besides i think we'll all agree we are not talking about magnitudes of
difference in this advice

-- 
Greg McCarroll                          http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Reply via email to