On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:43:28PM +0000, Michael Stevens wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 03:31:00PM +0000, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > Heh. djbdns is, despite being a bernsteinism, very good. For values of
> > 'very good' which are equivalent to 'not bind'. It's smaller, easier to
> > configure, and more secure. All in all, it's a Jolly Good Thing.
>
> <aol>
However, I don't believe it supports some of the more weird DNS entries
you can have like HINFO and LOC records.
[dcantrel@tim-the-enchanter dcantrel]$ nslookup
> set type=HINFO
> ariadne.barnyard.co.uk
ariadne.barnyard.co.uk CPU = Amstrad CPC OS = Amsdos / CPCIP
Yay! Not supporting such silliness may be considered a Bad Thing by some
people.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced
