* Simon Wistow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greg McCarroll wrote:
> 
> > reply-to having the address of the sender is the right thing,
> > 
> > it means when you reply to a message you reply to author of
> > that message, when you reply-all you reply to all
> 
> No. When you reply-all it replies to the sender *AND* the list. So the
> sender gets two copies of everything. Which is just fricking irritating
> *AND* a waste of bandwidth.

la la la la *has hands over ears* i cant here you, la la la la

> Yes I could have a procmail rule to delete duplicate message IDs but
> some places I work (like here) I can't use procmail. 

i can and do

-- 
Greg McCarroll                          http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Reply via email to