On Jan 22,  4:26pm, Greg McCarroll wrote:
> reply-to having the address of the sender is the right thing,
[...]
> its just the right thing

Nail meets hammer.  <thwack/>

If I explicitly set the Reply-To: in a message posted to the list then
the software is munging it to set it to reply to the list.  Therefore,
the current behaviour is wrong, even according to the "Munging Reply-To
considered harmful" arguments (which we don't necessarily accept as
valid).




A


-- 
Andy Wardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Signature regenerating.  Please remain seated.
     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   For a good time: http://www.kfs.org/~abw/

Reply via email to