On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Michael Stevens wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:18:53PM +0000, Dave Cross wrote:
> > You _do_ realise that I've now put the trademark notice on all of the 
> > london.pm web pages :)
> Anyone know if we could ACTUALLY trademark this?

To be registrable a trade mark must be:

distinctive for the goods/services 
for which registration is sought, 


not deceptive, or contrary to law or morality,


not identical or similar to any earlier marks for 
the same or similar goods/services. 

Unless you interpret that third criterion to mean that 
O'Reilly have a blanket trademark on all phrases of the class:

"The use of $THING in association with the Perl language..."

then I see no reason (except the bureacratic hassles) why 
it shouldn't be trademarkable, though IANAL... 


Reply via email to