On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:44:04PM +0000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Michael Stevens wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:40:29PM +0000, Simon Wilcox wrote: > > > At 16:29 20/03/2001 +0000, Jonathan Peterson wrote: > > > > > a) a two reasons why this module should never have been written, and > > > >2. MM DD YY is an evil date format, and should be abolished in favour of DD > > > >MM YY which is more sensible. > > > Or even better YY-MM-DD which avoids cross-pond confusion. > > And sorts more nicely too. and is a dessert topping *and* a floor wax. > > Am I allowed to mention YYYY-MM-DD, which actually sorts best of all... Do > we really not learn from Y2K? And it's even an ISO standard! -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ This is a signature. There are many like it but this one is mine. ** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your message is important **
- ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Simon Wilcox
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... AEF
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... David Cantrell
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Chris Devers
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Batistoni
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Mison
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Robinson
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Ian Brayshaw
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Cozens
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Andrew Bowman
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wilcox
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell