On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:44:04PM +0000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Michael Stevens wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 04:40:29PM +0000, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> > > At 16:29 20/03/2001 +0000, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> > > > > a) a two reasons why this module should never have been written, and
> > > >2. MM DD YY is an evil date format, and should be abolished in favour of DD
> > > >MM YY which is more sensible.
> > > Or even better YY-MM-DD which avoids cross-pond confusion.
> > And sorts more nicely too. and is a dessert topping *and* a floor wax.
> 
> Am I allowed to mention YYYY-MM-DD, which actually sorts best of all... Do
> we really not learn from Y2K?

And it's even an ISO standard!

-- 
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/

    This is a signature.  There are many like it but this one is mine.

** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your message is important **

PGP signature

Reply via email to