At 12:33 21/03/2001 +0000, Piers Cawley wrote: >Can I commend ISO 11180 to you? Hah - they think of everything. Just a shame that, as you have to pay for it, chances are most people won't use it. (Can you tell I feel strongly about this ;-) Simon.
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Modu... Simon Wilcox
- RE: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Modu... Jonathan Peterson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written ... Piers Cawley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writ... Simon Wilcox
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written ... Marcel Grunauer
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writ... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written ... Merijn Broeren
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written ... Marty Pauley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writ... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writ... Mark Fowler
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writ... pmh
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-... Robin Szemeti
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, B... Niklas Nordebo