Simon Wilcox wrote: > Or even better YY-MM-DD which avoids cross-pond confusion. Oh yeah? Which year, month, and day are represented by the combination 02-03-04? Depends on the side of the pond, and on which pond (MM-DD-YY in US, DD-MM-YY in UK, possibly YY-MM-DD in Japan). Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... David Cantrell
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Chris Devers
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Batistoni
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Mison
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Robinson
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Ian Brayshaw
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Cozens
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Andrew Bowman
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wilcox
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell