On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:07:52PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote: > If he [Sarathy] had a child, it would be called Sarathy Foo. Bit of a weird name for a kid, but I wouldn't put it past him. -- fga is frequently given answers... the best are "Date::Calc", "use a hash", and "yes, it's in CPAN" or Data::Dumper or mySQL or "check your permissions" or NO Fmh THAT'S WRONG or "You can't. crypt is one-way" or "yes, i'm single" or "I think that's a faq." or substr! or "use split" or "man perlre" - #perl
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless... pmh
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Point... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Redvers Davies
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... David H. Adler
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Paul Makepeace
- RE: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Andrew Bowman
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Piers Cawley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Chris Benson
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Simon Cozens
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-W... Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written M... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module... Philip Newton