On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote: > Chris Devers wrote: > > In any event, the leading 1 is never part of the phone > > number, but you always have to dial it whenever making a > > "long distance" call. > > Well, I would have thought that's just splitting hairs -- is the '0' part of > the number 0207 xxx xxxx is the number 207 xxx xxxx "but you have to dial a > 0 before that"? Comes out to the same thing. Except for... > I suppose I'd be splitting hairs if I pointed out that the dialing code for London is 020, meaning numbers should be shown as 020 xxxx xxxx. Of course BT mis-informing people in their own bumpf didn't help matters. Neil. -- Neil C. Ford Managing Director, Yet Another Computer Solutions Company Limited [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written... Chris Devers
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Wri... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... David Cantrell
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Neil Ford
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wistow
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Piers Cawley
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Mod... Paul Makepeace
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written... Chris Benson
- RE: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Clarke, Darren
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton