depends what you want from the exercise - if you are a perl shop and want
to know how good applicants are then, yes, CPH (but if you're a perl shop
you can pretty quickly determine how good people are anyway). so, i can't 
really see the point in this. 

i think it should sound like a professional certification a la MCSE simply
to address corporate criticisms that this is a hackers only language with
no certification.

i think the whole initiative should be more about making Perl be taken
more seriously OUTSIDE the community. 

alex

> 
> Shouldn't that be CPH for "Certified Perl Hacker" or is that missing 
> the point?
> 
> Dave...
> 

-- 
____________________________________________________
alex nunes | t 020 7603 5723 | f 020 7603 2504
director   | read the NEW story @ http://codix.net/
codix.net  | 107 shepherd's bush road, london w6 7lp   

Reply via email to