On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: > > Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P > > > > Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble* > > It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. > People with broken mail clients may disagree :-) I have a non-broken client which copes with multipart/alternative and I still disagree. For a text message the text part carries all the information, and the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. Nicholas Clark -- ENOJOB: http://plum.flirble.org/~nick/CV.html
