On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote:
> > Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P
> > Bloomin' Outlook & HTML ... *grumble*
> It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO.
> People with broken mail clients may disagree :-)
I have a non-broken client which copes with multipart/alternative and
I still disagree. For a text message the text part carries all the
information, and the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
my disk space at 4 times the rate.