On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 07:12:32PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Has anyone got an views on it or the Linux version?
> I haven't looked at it, but will. However, it does look from the web pages
> as if it requires me to download Activestate's distribution of perl. This
> is a Bad Thing. If it turns out that I can use my existing 5.6, then I'll
> give it a go, but if I have to fuck around, I won't bother.
Didn't notice that and since it won't install without a license i won't be
evaling it yet and can't confirm if it screws over existing installs.
> Methinks Activestate are too much in the Windows world, and need to learn
> about "if it ain't broke, don't fix it".
Someone needs to be in the Windows world and I'd rather them worry about it
than me ;)
>Rip, Mix, Burn, unless you're using our latest and greatest
>operating system which we couldn't be arsed to complete
I like this sig.
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand