On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:27:44AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > And didn't we have the argument(s) about sendmail vs. Net::SMTP and I'd be interested to hear a convincing argument for Net::SMTP. > inline HTML vs. template? "Hey! You think this 5K script is enough? Wrong, you've gotta configure CPAN, get these suite of modules that is a prerequisite for these suites of modules which include something like Data::Dumper which makes you pull down the latest f**king perl distribution which doesn't f**cking compile on your machine!" Yay for CPAN!! Which orifice would you like to have reamed with a scabby old splintering broom-handle today? Paul
- Re: Mailbox power .. Steve Mynott
- Re: Mailbox power .. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Mailbox power .. Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Mailbox power .. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Mailbox power .. Dave Hodgkinson
- Not Matt's Scripts Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Mark Fowler
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Dave Cross
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Paul Makepeace
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Richard Clamp
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: Not Matt's Scripts Robin Szemeti
- Re: Mailbox power .. Jonathan Peterson
- Funny thing Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Funny thing Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Funny thing Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Funny thing Robin Houston
- Re: Migrating South (was Good Accountants) David H. Adler
- Re: Migrating South (was Good Accountants) Jonathan Stowe