On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:22:38PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:41:58PM +0100, James Powell wrote: > > > You've hit the fundamental problem with XP. Getting anything done > > > requires two programmers to agree on something; this, as everyone > > > knows, is impossible. > > > > No it isn't! > > That's not argument, it's just contradiction! Yes it is! uh... hang on, that's not right. I'll come in again... dha -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ Trust the computer industry to shorten the term "Year 2000" to Y2K. It was this kind of thinking that got us in trouble in the first place. - Adrian Tyvand
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer... Simon Cozens
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP progra... James Powell
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP pr... AEF
- Dell asset numbers .. Robin Szemeti
- Re: Dell asset numbers .. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP pr... Simon Cozens
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an X... Struan Donald
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an X... Chris Devers
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an X... Leon Brocard
- Re: A look over the shoulder of... Robert Shiels
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an X... David H. Adler
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf... Philip Newton
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer... Simon Cozens
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf... Philip Newton
- Buffy ... Robin Szemeti
- Re: Buffy ... Dean
- Re: Buffy ... Dave Cross
- Re: Buffy ... David H. Adler
- Re: Buffy .. Andy Williams
- Re: Buffy .. Jonathan Peterson
- RE: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf... Cross David - dcross