> From: Robert Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Philip Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > At a guess: "Content-Encoding: gzip" instead.
> Yep that worked,
According to RFC2616 Content-Encoding: x-gzip should have worked as well:
Use of program names for the identification of encoding formats is not
desirable and is discouraged for future encodings. Their use here is
representative of historical practice, not good design. For
compatibility with previous implementations of HTTP, applications SHOULD
consider "x-gzip" and "x-compress" to be equivalent to "gzip" and
"compress" respectively.
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.5
Dave.
