Paul Makepeace wrote: > The -> to . conversion [...] will be a wonderful thing. To be honest, I never understood the point of that conversion. Is it an attempt to make Perl look more like VB? Or like Java? Or trying to save keystrokes? Simplify the lexer? The array seemed fine to me the way it was. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Greg McCarroll
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Piers Cawley
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] David Cantrell
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... David Cantrell
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exege... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exege... Robin Szemeti
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's ... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis ... Chris Devers
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Damian Conway
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Philip Newton
- Re: [gnat@frii.com: Damian Conway's Exegesis 2] Paul Makepeace