Re: Tie::Hash::Regex vs Tie::RegexpHash

[Piers Cawley]

Chris Devers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> At 02:18 PM 2001.05.25 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> >[1] Hmmm... note to self - see if you can come up 
> >with a tied hash that abbreviates to T::H::C.
> 
> Semi-plausible: Tie::Hash::Complex
> Not-plausible: Tie::Hash::Cannabis
> 
> Might see the light of day?: Tie::Hash::Conway

Presumably this will lead to a load of gags about not wanting to go
too far from his stash?

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com