On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > Andy Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > Has any one used this module at all?
> > How does it match up against tchrist's stuff?
> All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr:
> user: andyw. is good
> host: hillway.com is good
> address `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is bad: rfc822 failure
> So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works.... wierd!
Keep in mind that "valid" and "deliverable" are, sadly, not actually
related terms wrt email...
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
If I ever saw this in real code I'd beat the author senseless with
their own limbs.
- Michael G. Schwern