On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Struan Donald wrote:
> * at 19/06 15:47 +0100 Robert Thompson said:
> <snip/>
> > E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
> > information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
> > incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
> > liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which
> > arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please
> > request a hard-copy version.
> email: we use it but we don't trust it.
It's what you get in a world full of SexChange and Bloated Goats</rant>
MBM (has been unimpressed by Lotus' decision that Notes was allowed to
modify the local-part of a mail that it was not MX-ing for in any way.
Also the blunt refusal by MTA authors to understand the transfer of
responsibility concept for delivery of the message or a bounce. And,
if that weren't enough, the configuration of whsmithonline, who not
only have an invalid EHLO line, but have a non-backed-off retry set
to 2 mins, I don't know what mailer that was....)
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://colondot.net/
