David Cantrell wrote:
>
> > o it is not Perl (yes, we can argue on this point, but let's not)
>
> No, lets. You don't win arguments by defining certain contentious issues
> as being out-of-bounds.
>
> I remain open to persuasion, but haven't yet been convinced that I should
> spend any time with it, let alone that it is a better solution for anything
> I want to do than the competition.
>
AFAICT .. TT end Embperl approach the subject from totally diffrent
perspectives .. TT allows you to call up hash values or object methods as you
need em and generally encourages you to keep your code in your .pm's and your
HTML in your templates ...Embperl is more pointed at getting little chunks of
Perl that produce HTML slopped all around your templates ...
TT is safer to let designers loose on as they need know nothing about the
underlying implementation they just know they do
[% FOREACH user=myorg.getusers %] and lo it works .. Empperl is more like
PHP in thta respect .. it attempts to get as much code into the 'templates' as
it can TT ttries to seperate it ,,
well .. thats how I see it anyway .. of course .. as usua, in probably worng
again.
anyone going to the linux thing next thursday? .. he asked .. in a thread
dispersal moment?
