On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:21:33AM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> I think this is an excellent compromise.
Agreed!
> Result of quick proof-reading follows...
Ditto:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:10:37AM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> > <p> The alternatives range from low level 'I just write custom perl each
s/perl/Perl/
> > time', though to using perl embedding languages, right up to using Matt
s/though/through/
s/perl/Perl/
> > Sergeant's excellent <a href="www.axkit.org">AxKit</a>, a XML Application
s/a XML/an XML/
> > Server (which Matt also gave us a talk on.) At last count there where 33
>
> s/where/were/
>
> > different templating systems for perl (though this figure cannot possible
> > not have changed by the time you're reading this.) Note that these aren't
s/perl/Perl/
s/cannot possible not/may/
Tom
