Steve Mynott wrote: > 640x480 is more commonly used as a lowest common denominator by most > web design companies for the usual web market. The ironic thing is that designers who have been triumphantly crowing that bandwidth is getting fatter, nobody uses everything but IE5 under Windows and can run at 1024x768 in 16.7 Million colours minimum now have to deal with WebTV, Set-top boxes, WebAppliances, Kiosks, PDAs and cHTML enabled browsers over very slow links. Laugh? I almost did. God I don't miss web design. Course, I'm doing Wap now which is even worse, still ... -- simon wistow wireless systems coder just another shin jin rui
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Robert Shiels
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Greg McCarroll
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Steve Mynott
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Greg McCarroll
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Paul Mison
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Natalie Ford
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Philip Newton
- RE: Website: no longer fixed width Lee Goddard
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Kevin O'Rourke
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Steve Mynott
- RE: Website: no longer fixed width) Simon Wistow
- RE: Website: no longer fixed width) Lee Goddard
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Robin Szemeti
- RE: Website: no longer fixed width Lee Goddard
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Simon Wistow
- RE: Website: no longer fixed width Paul Mison
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Robert Shiels
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Paul Makepeace
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Robin Szemeti
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Simon Wistow
- Re: Website: no longer fixed width Rob Partington