On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:46:55PM +0000, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
> Chris Benson wrote:
> > But surely this discussion is pointless since everyone logs in as
> > Administrator[*1] and leaves the permissions as they are, don't they.
> Nix and NT share this trait. There are a number of common tasks that
> should be do-able as a user but you actually have to be root/admin to do
> them.

Such as?

Mounting CDs and floppies? the automounter does it
setting up a PPP connection? your sysasdmin should have configured the
  appropriate setuid root stuff
Installing software? if you can't install it in your home directory, then
  a user has no business trying to install it

I use a Solaris machine as my desktop at work.  I don't have root.  I rarely
need root.  When I do it is to do things like install extra software for
testing, or so I can do networky things.  Every single one of those cases is
legitimate development work, and I do it on a dev server where the admins
will do that for me.

Even on my own personal Linux desktop, where I do have root, I have used
that capability [looks at logs] just once in the last 24 hours*.  Today is
not unusual.

>       Then people get into the habit of (for instance) always installing
> new software as root/admin rather than checking to see what permissions
> are _actually_ required.

That's a people problem, not an OS problem.  But on Windows this is more
likely to be required.

> However, in file sharing situations, Unix's (default?) permission system
> is utterly useless, and not nearly fine grained enough to cope with real
> requirements in large offices.

Same as NT.  Having a PDC and BDC and domain accounts is most definitely
not the default, and it's a bugger to administer too by all accounts.  On
'nix we have NIS to do that job, and whilst it's a bugger to set up
properly and securely (some would argue that it *can't* be set up securely**)
it is at least easy to administer once it has been.

* - sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get upgrade

** - I say that it depends how secure you need to be.  It can certainly be
secure enough for us to use at work for well over a hundred users, with
probably the worst user demographic possible from a security PoV.

-- 
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david

       The Americans will always do the right thing...
       after they've exhausted  all the alternatives.
                                  -- Winston Churchill

Reply via email to