On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0000, Cal Henderson wrote:
> : -----Original Message-----
> : From: Alex McLintock [mailto:alex@;OWAL.co.uk]
> : 
> : Is it standard practice that technical reviewers don't get paid? I am
> happy 
> : to do the review anyway because I run DiverseBooks.com but I'd like to
> know 
> : that I am not being taken advantage of.
> 
> I've done technical editing for New Riders and they do pay for it. Wiley
> don't
> pay for it iirc. It seems to vary by publisher.

Do the publishers that pay their technical reviews tend to get better
quality technical reviews than those who don't?

Nicholas Clark

Reply via email to