On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:15:03AM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > I wouldn't touch 3, precisely because of nonsense like that. Their > network is rubbish even in the UK - so much so that they have roaming > agreements *in the UK* - but roaming 3 customers don't get 3G. > > Another reason to not use them is that their name is rubbish.
So on that basis the approved-by-london.pm network is the one that isn't sure whether its name is #ff5500 or #ff6600 ? [or several other variants nearer the edges of its logo, at least the version on its website. I'm a bit surprised that there is this much variation. A long time ex-employer of mine was bloody sure that its (then) new logo was Pantone Rhodamine Red: http://www.tnsglobal.com/ And yes, I think it's misnamed. "Improved Engine Red" would be better :-) ] Nicholas Clark
