On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:37:45PM -0700, Kip Warner wrote: > On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 21:32 +0200, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > > In any case, that binary blob won't compromise the OS security. So it > > allows quite a freedom already, I think. > > I hear you, but like I said, I'm already comfortable with it. We need to > make RMS happy though.
Hence the point about the ROM. A way to give the freedom to change anything reprogrammable, is either to provide the source code of that program, or to make it not reprogrammable. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "loongson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/loongson-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
