Hi YunQuiang,

>>>>> "YunQiang" == YunQiang Su <[email protected]> writes:

> I am working on port Debian to mips64el platform (mips64elr2 indeed)
> When working on boost1.54, it has a libboost-context now which is not
> exist in boost1.49.

> boost-context has some assembly code then mips64(el) is marked as
> unsupported for now.  Maybe we should port it to mips64(el)

Your email is a little unclear to me.  I guess the boost-context
inline-assembly problem is unrelated to the compiler error you mention?

Are you referring to source files

  ./boost_1_54_0/libs/context/src/asm/make_mips32_o32_elf_gas.S
  ./boost_1_54_0/libs/context/src/asm/jump_mips32_o32_elf_gas.S

?

This should be pretty easy to fix.  I could have a look at it, but I'm
currently swamped with a lot of work, so may take some time (I didn't
even have time to upgrade my fuloong from squeeze to wheezy yet).

It would help a lot if you could give me login access to a (very fast :)
mips debian machine that has all the required toolchain packages for
mips64 builds installed.

> There is a gcc internal error like
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715526

WRT the compiler error, did you try to reproduce the error with the
latest 4.8 series GCC built from sources provided by
http://gcc.gnu.org/?  When tracking down architecture related GCC bugs,
the GCC people may be much more ressourceful (helpful) then the Debian
people.  In case you can reproduce the bug, just create a new bug with
the single preprocessed source file that triggers the bug attached (plus
GCC command line) here:

  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

Just my two cents.

> FYI: mips(el) architectures may be removed from Debian for next
> release

Yes, bad news.  Maybe you should have CCed debian-mips in your email, to
raise some more awareness?

As long as the mips64 effort becomes usable within the next years, I for
one won't miss Debian mips(32)el :)

cheers,

David
-- 
GnuPG public key: http://dvdkhlng.users.sourceforge.net/dk2.gpg
Fingerprint: B63B 6AF2 4EEB F033 46F7  7F1D 935E 6F08 E457 205F

Attachment: pgpD_kW0cSf4E.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to