RE: Hello

[Paul Tiger]

I am getting your messages. I am not sure that Gregg uses this list. One thing that I have noted is that he always replies to individuals rather than the list. If I post a message he replies to me, not this list. I have explained to him about the settings in his emailer, but it still isn’t working.   If you sent something to this list, Gregg should have gotten it. If he replies, it will be to you and you alone.   I am happy about what Dana said the other week about needing to give candidates wiggle room, but I thought that this was already a given. Nice to say it, but it is already so.   I would like to know why you reject it in its entirety? I only have issues with the length of it, or of each statement.   BTW – if you haven’t noticed, I’m back from drinking rum on the beach and ready to work with whatever time is left.   In a conversation with Norm, I have come to understand that we are not bound by the April date. Certainly we should have something to present to the BoD, but we can and should continue to work until the job is done. Granted that the job will never be done, because the local issues are what we are addressing and will change over time. The basic thing that I would like to see it that we do have a state platform framework, independent of national.   Did we select someone to be chair of this committee, since Vance blew us off? By-laws says that we are supposed to. We don’t have to wait for the BoD to select another member of the BoD for us.   paul   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John A. Lappart Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Hello   Paul, Dana, Gregg.    This is an inquirary to find out if each of you are recieving from this address.   I have sent several messages to Gregg asking him to reply, and recieved no responce.   The draft that Gregg put up, I totally reject and have given my reasons, only Daana has responded.   What passes with the rest of you??   jal