Anselm Lingnau wrote: > I'm absolutely impressed with the amount of work that has gone into LPIC-3. > There have been so many rumours about LPIC-3 during the years that I've been > involved with LPI that it is good to see us moving forward on this > eventually. I have a nagging suspicion that, considering that the ratio of > LPIC-1 candidates to LPIC-2 candidates is approximately 10:1 (at least here > in Germany), and stipulating that the ratio of LPIC-2 candidates to LPIC-3 > candidates is about the same at most, the work required to support a couple > of hundred candidates a year might be more profitably invested elsewhere > within the LPI world but hey! this is still something of a community project, > so if there are people willing to do the work then by all means let them.
I helped organize the LPIC-3 beta exam lab in Montreal last week. I had the opportunity to test exam 302, and I am really impressed with the quality and pertinence of the exam. Good work, guys. That being said, I believe that LPIC-3 might actually boost the number of LPIC-2 holder, as some people will get LPIC-2 as a pre-requisite to LPIC-3. Most of the people at the Montreal event where not LPIC-2 holder, and some actually took renewed interest in the LPIC track and wrote some 10x/20x exams. I would not expect the influx of new LPIC-1/2 holder chasing LPIC-3 to be very big, but the effect could only be positive. At the very least, LPIC-3 will provide very good positioning and credibility for LPI (if done well). -- Etienne Goyer 0x3106BCC2 "For Bruce Schneier, SHA-1 is merely a compression algorithm." http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/164
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
