Bryan J. Smith wrote:
This hackery is, um, the supported procedure to use AFS and Kerberos V
together, so good work. To do it better, you had to either a) replace
rx or b) replace the security support in rx. There was talk about doing
a. Rxk5 is one way to do b (there is one other way that has been
advocated, which may or may not happen soon).
[snip]
I have only implemented AFS in passing, and almost strictly
limited to use in existing Kerberos 5 realms (using the krb4
compatibility and probably more of a "hacked" setup compared to
someone like yourself).
I never meant to accuse you of hypocrisy, Bryan. And I think I agree
with your basic position, to the extent I can (I am trying to track, but
not influence what is in LPIC-3*. I'm just trying to stick up for guys
like Steve Holdoway. They are just trying to keep Samba in sight in
this discussion, and they are seeing a huge dust cloud of NFSv4 flying
up in the air.
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
