Anselm Lingnau schrieb:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Does the concept of "tutorials" for an advanced exam ring huge alarm
bells in your heads like it does in mine? I consider that someone who
desires a study guide for an expert exam is in no position to be
remotely close to writing the exam. Such a person does not need a study
guide, they need another three years behind the keyboard gaining real
world experience.
This is what I keep telling people who ask us to send them our training
manuals »for LPIC-1, LPIC-2, and LPIC-3«. They tend to not like this answer.
I suggest to make a difference between a tutorial for self study (that
is at a beginner's level) and a "tutorial" that is a kind of reminder
before taking an exam (for the expert with a lot of practice).
To be fair I have to say that even after years of practice, I still
haven't touched *all* the options (not to talk about the long-options)
of all the commands and config files - well nearly all -, and I
personally find it helpful to prepare myself for an exam with some kind
of "tutorial" that gives a brief description of all the stuff I must
keep in mind.
Just that. I share Your opinions.
Tilman Wittenhorst
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
