Over time I've heard a lot about paper MCSE's. To tell you the truth, I'm much better at doing than taking an exam to begin with (I have no idea why, but test taking is not my strongest skill), so I would never make even a good paper MCSE (Even for MS exams I really do a lot better with practical experience except for the fact that I often disagree with the questions). This being said I don't think that it is very likely that someone would be a paper LPIC-3. The material builds on itself in such a way that I think if you can pass the test, you really do have to have experience to go with it. I think that comparing MS related exams in this regard to LPI exams is like comparing a calculus exam to an American history exam. On the calculus test you will not be able to just memorize stuff because of the way math builds on itself. For a history exam, memorization is the real key (along with hopefully a bit of critical thinking) to getting an A.
_______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
