Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren. ich muss sie leider davon in Kenntnis setzen, dass Herr Norbert Steingrübl am 11. September 2013 verstorben ist.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen Gabriele Scherbening -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von [email protected] Gesendet: Freitag, 1. November 2013 17:00 An: [email protected] Betreff: lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 83, Issue 1 Send lpi-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of lpi-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: "Openstack essential" certification (Fabian Thorns) 2. Re: "Openstack essential" certification (Franck Pascal Demengue) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:44:25 +0100 From: Fabian Thorns <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] "Openstack essential" certification To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Hedi, my personal opinion (and the conclusion of some discussions I had with several people) of this is that LPI so far has been vendor-/project-/product-neutral and that this property of LPI is a crucial aspect of the "brand" LPI. Therefore such an exam should be more like a "Infrastructure Cloud Exam", which may also cover aspects of Cloudstack, OpenNebula and Eucalpytus. I would however argue that there are not so many candidates around who have strong knowledge in the combination of so many cloud stacks. That being said one could of course consider something link an "associate exam track" where exams that violate the neutrality constraint are placed and could be supported by LPI either during exam development, exam delivery and linking to LPI exams as pre-requirements. This would be a perfect place for a pure Openstack Exam (as well as for some other exams that somehow relate to LPI (some of them already exist, though not all are linked to LPI)). Those are, however, my personal thoughts only but I'd love to read more opinions on this! Best regards, Fabian ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 07:50:53 +0000 (GMT) From: Franck Pascal Demengue <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] "Openstack essential" certification To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ?I think openstack essential? is cool program? but LPI have a same program the LPI center can check the program and add the new at the current program? and update Demengue Franck Pascal RHCE and ADMIN ORACLE DATABASE Tel: 27794651133 / 23777774116 ________________________________ De?: Hedi MAGROUN <[email protected]> ??: [email protected] Envoy? le : Jeudi 31 octobre 2013 16h07 Objet?: [lpi-discuss] "Openstack essential" certification i want just to know your pointe of view about creating a new LPI certification : "openstack essential" ? -- Hedi MAGROUN [email protected] _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://list.lpi.org/pipermail/lpi-discuss/attachments/20131101/4e158ccb/atta chment-0001.htm ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss End of lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 83, Issue 1 ****************************************** _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
