Hi.

 I'm trying to find out if I can still take the 202 exam. 

I passed exam 201 towards the LPIC2 on Dec 
2010 (approx 3yrs & 4 months ago) and I received the LPIC1 on Feb 2009 
(5 yrs ago).

I see that exams stay current for 5 yrs.  The requirements web pg states that 
you need LPIC1 as prereq  for LPIC2. 

My question is, Can I take the 202 exam and receive the LPIC 2? 

I
 have been progressing under assumption that as long as I kept taking an
 exam(s)within 5 year period that would keep things current to continue 
to progress with the next exam in the sequence; 101, 102, 201, 202, 301 
...  3. Is this correct? 

I am hoping because I completed the LPI 201
 exam 3 years ago in Dec 2010, that this keep me current and allows me to 
continue 
to progress and that I can take the 202 to receive the LPIC2,  please confirm

thank you

> From: al...@rosedu.org
> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 18:01:24 +0200
> To: lpi-discuss@lpi.org
> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] FAQ :- Do LPI certifications expire?
> 
> On 28 December 2013 01:53, Anselm Lingnau <anselm.ling...@linupfront.de> 
> wrote:
> > Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> >
> >> Can someone please help me understand recertification process?
> >
> > First of all, LPI certifications don't expire – or at least they don't 
> > expire
> > like some other certifications do, as in »the certification organisation 
> > will
> > forget that you ever existed«.
> 
> I beg to differ on that.
> 
> My experience with other certification providers is the same as with LPI.
> Nobody will tell you that after $TIMEOUT years, it's like you never
> passed the exams. They will say that you were certified many years
> ago.
> 
> >
> > What does happen is that five years after you gained an LPI certificate, the
> > status of that certificate in LPI's database is set to »inactive«. The
> > reasoning behind this is that if LPI hasn't heard from you in five years, 
> > your
> > Linux admin skills may have become a bit rusty (Linux being the moving 
> > target
> > that it is). However, the fact that you did pass the certificate at some 
> > point
> > will stay on record forever. (Both your certificate and your little LPIC 
> > card
> > give the date of your certification, so if you're presenting a 2005-vintage
> > certificate when applying for a job in 2014, your prospective employer may 
> > be
> > less than impressed, but may still be more impressed than they would be if 
> > you
> > had no certificate to show at all. Your employer *will* be able to check 
> > your
> > certificate against LPI's alumni database, though, which would not work with
> > certificates from various other vendors and their respective alumni
> > databases.)
> >
> > You can prevent your certificate from becoming »inactive« by 
> > »re-certifying«,
> > which means either re-taking (just) the exams that led to that 
> > certification,
> > or else obtaining a higher-level certificate. Whenever you pass the
> > appropriate exams to gain an LPI certificate, the five-year clock will start
> > for that certificate and all active »lesser« LPI certificates that you hold.
> >
> > By way of example, let's assume Alice passed the LPI-101 and LPI-102 exams 
> > on
> > 23 April, 2009, to gain her LPIC-1 certificate. That certificate will become
> > inactive on 23 April, 2014, unless Alice either re-passes LPI-101 and 
> > LPI-102
> > or else passes LPI-201 and LPI-202 to gain an LPIC-2 certificate before that
> > date. If Alice passes LPI-201 and LPI-202 on 21 April, 2014 then the clock
> > will be started again for both her LPIC-1 and LPIC-2 certificates, and she
> > will have to re-certify before 21 April, 2019, either by re-passing LPI-201
> > and LPI-202 or else passing any of the LPIC-3 speciality exams to gain an
> > LPIC-3 certificate, at which time the clock will be restarted for her LPIC-2
> > and LPIC-1 exams too. (Note that Alice will NOT have to re-take LPI-101 and
> > LPI-102 to re-certify at LPIC-2 level between 21 April 2014 and 21 April
> > 2019.)
> >
> > It is a bit unclear (at least to me) what will happen with the LPIC-3
> > speciality exams. Presumably, given that there are no higher-level
> > certifications you could take, you will have to re-certify by re-taking the
> > exam in question. Maybe someone from LPI can clarify what the current policy
> > is.
> >
> > Don't worry too much about the two-year thing. This is a recommendation 
> > based
> > on the (debatable) assumption that either Linux or the LPI exams will have
> > changed enough within two years that it would make sense to re-certify just 
> > to
> > document that your Linux knowledge is very current indeed. My personal take 
> > is
> > that regardless of what happens with Linux itself, it generally takes 
> > somewhat
> > more than two years for the LPI exam objectives to be updated to account for
> > any intervening important changes to Linux, and so if you want to be 
> > maximally
> > up-to-date it would make sense to track new versions of the exams and re-
> > certify either when there are actual interesting-looking changes to the exam
> > objectives of your highest-level LPI certificate, or when 4 years and 11
> > months have elapsed since your last exam for that certificate, whichever
> > occurs earlier.
> >
> > Finally, there has been some exploratory discussion regarding 
> > re-certification
> > methods other than the re-taking of exams (which would be interesting at the
> > LPIC-3 level in particular). This might include mentoring other LPIC
> > candidates, taking part in discussions on LPI social networking sites,
> > submitting records of relevant professional experience, or otherwise
> > convincing LPI that you are still around and active. No concrete proposals
> > have however been put forward as yet (that I am aware of).
> >
> > Anselm
> > (Not speaking for my employer.)
> > --
> > Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & 
> > Netz-Schulungen
> > anselm.ling...@linupfront.de, +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, 
> > www.linupfront.de
> > Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany
> > Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel
> > _______________________________________________
> > lpi-discuss mailing list
> > lpi-discuss@lpi.org
> > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-discuss mailing list
> lpi-discuss@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
                                          
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to