I think the version to test in Linux is centos6 is very good version when u work in startup u finding it, so it preferable to test the majority version Think all about this information and good days
Cordialement El Najim Mohamed Ingénieur système Tél 06.23.96.40.08 Le 13 avr. 2015 à 18:00, [email protected] a écrit : > Send lpi-discuss mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lpi-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: which versions of Linux will be tested for LX0-103 and > 104? (SONFACK SOUNCHIO SERGE) > 2. Re: which versions of Linux will be tested for LX0-103 and > 104? (Anselm Lingnau) > 3. Re: is it time to remove "vi" from the exam? > (Andrzej Szczygielski) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:08:26 +0000 (UTC) > From: SONFACK SOUNCHIO SERGE <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] which versions of Linux will be tested for > LX0-103 and 104? > To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I think Debian and CentOS are good for LPI preparations > > > On Saturday, April 11, 2015 12:39 AM, G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Ted Jordan, JordanTeam Learning LLC > <[email protected]> wrote: >> will this be Debian 7 and Centos 7 basically? > > Hi Ted, > > The short answer is "none of the above".? Although, those are good > choices for the minimal set. > > There's been a couple of threads on "which distro to learn on" on the > lpi-examdev list, too.? May I suggest you join that list, check out > the archives and revive that horse for some more kicking over there? > :) > > ? ? http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > > Regards, > --matt > -- > G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? gpg id: EF9AAD20 > _______________________________________________ > lpi-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://list.lpi.org/pipermail/lpi-discuss/attachments/20150413/8fa6fe00/attachment.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:22:17 +0200 > From: Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] which versions of Linux will be tested for > LX0-103 and 104? > To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > SONFACK SOUNCHIO SERGE <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think Debian and CentOS are good for LPI preparations > > In theory you want to look at a distribution that uses Debian packaging > tools as well as one that uses RPM. On that account the two are > reasonable choices. > > The bigger issue is that you will have to find a distribution that still > uses System-V init, which rules out any current mainstream distribution > with the exception of Debian (until Debian 8 comes out a few weeks from > now, at any rate). It's probably a good idea to hang on to a Debian 7.x > installation image. > > Other than the packaging tools and init system, as far as LPIC-1 is > concerned all modern Linux distributions are basically the same, so use > whatever you like. Although, in the age of virtualisation trying > different distributions is no longer a big deal, and a little horizon > widening never harmed anybody. > > Anselm > -- > Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen > [email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de > Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany > Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Oliver Michel > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:23:15 +0100 > From: Andrzej Szczygielski <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] is it time to remove "vi" from the exam? > To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <CAGvJcaOj0n0rEojZ2iLNdJHYcT3Q45tiM9mYYELkqf=j74f...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Yes it is 21 century but does it mean reliable although old tools (so to > speak) are worthless. If age is your main issue so propably it is worth > realising how many 'aged' technologies are still in use today and they are > based on principles as old as humanity >> On 13 Apr 2015 00:48, "Anselm Lingnau" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ross Brunson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I can definitively state, but even if you object if you do not include >> VI, >>> I will still use it, and I will still teach my attendees how to use. >> >> I don't think anybody here would disagree with the observation that a >> working knowledge of the basics of vi is a useful thing to have. It >> builds character (in the way that cod liver oil used to build character, >> way back when we didn't have vi) and can occasionally help one out of a >> tight place. >> >> Whether that observation justifies the conclusion that vi is a >> reasonable (or, deity beware, generally recommended) editor for one's >> non-sysadmin day-to-day work ? not just editing configuration files, but >> writing code, memos, e-mail, or theses ? in the 21st century, or that it >> is appropriate to cover the usage of vi (as opposed to the existence or >> purpose of vi) in a multiple-choice exam for fledgling system >> administrators, are completely different and unrelated questions. (To be >> sure, there are people ? especially old-school people who have been >> around for a while ? who do consider vi the single best editor for >> everything and who go through life in blissful happiness on that >> account. More power to them, but this is the 21st century, and there are >> other good editors that people can reasonably use for their day-to-day >> work.) >> >> We teach our attendees lots of things which are not on the official LPI >> syllabus, but (for a variety of reasons) we don't try to force these >> things onto the syllabus. Getting rid of the vi objective in the LPI-101 >> exam would in no way prevent anyone from teaching people how to use vi >> if they thought it was so important, but it would remove the need for >> people to learn the obscure details of a 1970s-era tool when there are >> other more modern, perfectly adequate, and widely deployed alternatives >> around. And as I said, if the main reason you're into vi is that ?it >> exists everywhere?, you should really teach people ed(1) because that >> works in places where even vi can't go. >> >> If anything, the vi content on the exam should in my opinion be >> downgraded to weight 1 to cover cursor keys (or ?hjkl? if you must), >> ?x?, ?i?, ?O?, ?J? and ?ZZ?. This is a reasonable minimum to be able to >> edit configuration files. Again, one should feel free to teach more if >> one can do it without putting one's students to sleep, but the exam can >> well afford to stick to the basics, and it would free up 2 weight points >> which can be profitably employed elsewhere. >> >> Anselm >> >> Disclaimer: This is my personal opinion and not that of my employer. My >> employer has so far not expressed an opinion about vi. It is fairly >> safe to assume that my employer has no idea that vi even exists in the >> first place. >> -- >> Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & >> Netz-Schulungen >> [email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, >> www.linupfront.de >> Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany >> Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Oliver Michel >> _______________________________________________ >> lpi-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://list.lpi.org/pipermail/lpi-discuss/attachments/20150413/f0b5af20/attachment-0001.htm > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss > > End of lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 10 > ******************************************* _______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
