Thank Julio STORCH, i happy that some body try to help me
Envoyé depuis Windows Mail
De : lpi-discuss-requ...@lpi.org
Envoyé : vendredi 17 avril 2015 18:00
À : lpi-discuss@lpi.org
Send lpi-discuss mailing list submissions to
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
lpi-discuss-requ...@lpi.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
lpi-discuss-ow...@lpi.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lpi-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Request for not receive certificat (Julio Storch)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 11:44:19 +0200
From: Julio Storch <escobar.sto...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] Request for not receive certificat
To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <lpi-discuss@lpi.org>
Message-ID:
<ca+1fgvqyus_rfc1bbvixoazadq3j05lefzjghbgqidclss9...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Just mail to i...@lpi.org
They will help you
Julio Cesar Escobar Storch
Mobile +49 163 693 2780
please, i am sorry for this who don?t concern the discuss, but i have
success my LPI-C 1 on januar 2014 ,since never receive my certificat and
don?t have any address to contact in the LPI side for request this , if
there is any body know how can i proccess he/she should contact me by this
address. thank for all
Envoy? depuis Windows Mail
*De :* lpi-discuss-requ...@lpi.org
*Envoy? :* ?mercredi? ?15? ?avril? ?2015 ?18?:?00
*? :* lpi-discuss@lpi.org
Send lpi-discuss mailing list submissions to
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
lpi-discuss-requ...@lpi.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
lpi-discuss-ow...@lpi.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lpi-discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 14 (?der Pereira)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:41:43 -0300
From: ?der Pereira <uni...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 14
To: lpi-discuss@lpi.org
Message-ID:
<cak9g4gqxefexktrrtjmlnndde+hq4sc9d8qvobabsreysaq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Alan, sorry for the misunderstanding.
at;
EDer
*Eder Paulo Pereira*
2015-04-14 13:00 GMT-03:00 <lpi-discuss-requ...@lpi.org>:
> Send lpi-discuss mailing list submissions to
> lpi-discuss@lpi.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> lpi-discuss-requ...@lpi.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> lpi-discuss-ow...@lpi.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lpi-discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 12 (Alan McKinnon)
> 2. Re: is it time to remove "vi" from the exam? (Anselm Lingnau)
> 3. Re: lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 12 (Anselm Lingnau)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:14:04 +0200
> From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 12
> To: lpi-discuss@lpi.org
> Message-ID: <552c157c.1040...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> On 13/04/2015 20:04, ?der Pereira wrote:
> > I consider the 'vi' as a great text editor to terminals. What do you
> > suggest to use Anselm? I manage multiple servers, and it has been my
> > faithful companion, fast, easy, simple, once you learn, you'll never
> > forget it, anyway, I like it, but if you have a better suggestion, I'm
> > curious to know.
>
> I think your question reflects a general confusion going on through this
> thread.
>
> The topic is not whether vi is useful or not, or whether is it
> maintained as vim or not, whether it is the best possible editor for you
> or not. vi is simply a tool, a means to an end. And that end is a
> changed file (usually a text file).
>
> The question at hand is whether vi warrants inclusion in the LPIC-1 exam
> or not, and that is something entirely different because then it has to
> satisfy a very different set of criteria than "I find it a very useful
> tool".
>
> But to answer your question, the correct answer is whatever suits your
> needs. For console editors you have pico, joe, nano and all their
> derivatives. For GUI editors you have gedit, kwrite, kate.
>
> Plus a very long long list of other more niche editors. Take your pick.
>
> For the record, I'm a major vi fan. I also refuse to teach it - I will
> go as far as having students run vimtutor and no further.
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alan McKinnon
> alan.mckin...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:53:07 +0200
> From: Anselm Lingnau <anselm.ling...@linupfront.de>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] is it time to remove "vi" from the exam?
> To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <lpi-discuss@lpi.org>
> Message-ID: <871tjnaj6n....@ceol.strathspey.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Andrzej Szczygielski <andrze...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > People aspiring to be IT professional should be ready to be
> inconvenienced
> > by complexity of technology he/she is going to deal with
>
> People aspiring to be IT professionals should be encouraged to *avoid*
> complexity wherever possible. There is a very widespread misconception
> that ?complex = good? which is at the root of many issues that plague us
> today. If there's any choice at all we should go for the simple
> approaches. Simple is easier to use, easier to write, easier to
> configure, easier to debug, easier to understand, easier to
> document. Simple is safer.
>
> IOW, many problems in IT have complex solutions because simple solutions
> for them appear not to be feasible. Text editing does not belong to that
> class of problem. It should not be made arbitrarily complex just to
> please some people who have already spent altogether too much time on
> the needlessly-complex approach and believe that now everyone else
> should have to, too.
>
> Anselm
> --
> Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- &
> Netz-Schulungen
> anselm.ling...@linupfront.de, +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299,
> www.linupfront.de
> Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany
> Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Oliver Michel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:06:38 +0200
> From: Anselm Lingnau <anselm.ling...@linupfront.de>
> Subject: Re: [lpi-discuss] lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 12
> To: "General discussion relating to LPI." <lpi-discuss@lpi.org>
> Message-ID: <87zj6b945j....@ceol.strathspey.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> ?der Pereira <uni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I consider the 'vi' as a great text editor to terminals. What do you
> > suggest to use Anselm? I manage multiple servers, and it has been my
> > faithful companion, fast, easy, simple, once you learn, you'll never
> forget
> > it, anyway, I like it, but if you have a better suggestion, I'm curious
> to
> > know.
>
> By all means do use vi (especially if you know it already). Other folks
> might like other editors ? pico, nano, MicroEmacs, ?, whatever. The list
> is virtually endless, and as Alan points out, various non-vi editors are
> either part of the default install of many Linux distributions or else
> available for easy and convenient installation after the fact. We do
> teach people how to install additional software packages, and that
> knowledge can be put to profitable use right away.
>
> People (other than Alan) don't seem to understand that there is a big
> difference between using vi and putting vi on the LPIC-1 exam. Nobody
> wants to take vi away from anyone who wants to use it. However, those
> people who argue that vi must be on the LPIC-1 exam essentially argue
> that *every* LPIC-1 candidate should be *forced* to learn vi, whether
> they need or want it or not. That is what I'm opposing, not any
> individual's personal use of vi.
>
> Anselm
> --
> Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- &
> Netz-Schulungen
> anselm.ling...@linupfront.de, +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299,
> www.linupfront.de
> Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany
> Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Oliver Michel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-discuss mailing list
> lpi-discuss@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
>
> End of lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 14
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://list.lpi.org/pipermail/lpi-discuss/attachments/20150414/d7912094/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
End of lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 15
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://list.lpi.org/pipermail/lpi-discuss/attachments/20150417/7aa858ec/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
End of lpi-discuss Digest, Vol 94, Issue 18
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
