/* I was just pointing out that some (e.g., LZ4/p7z) have program that are getting blacklisted by the US, which does affect some American allies as well, and definitely American companies operating in Europe (and elsewhere). */
I guess I missed something. The US is blacklisting compression techniques? Or are they blacklisting encryption techniques? The latter I could *almost* understand, but the former? In any case, if you are going to remove specific packages of compression techniques (fair enough), you should at least talk about the differences between lossy vs lossless techniques and where they might be used and how they might or might not be useful in combination with archiving tools (lossy compression of archiving tool output is a recipe for disaster). md On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:00 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Send lpi-examdev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lpi-examdev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: LPIC-2 Objectives Review (Bryan Smith) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 04:18:01 -0500 > From: Bryan Smith <[email protected]> > To: LPI Exam Development <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lpi-examdev] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: LPIC-2 Objectives > Review > Message-ID: > <CAH1d5rkDL_tBM1QZ+Gf68_jddRHB==_ > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 8:30 PM Anselm Lingnau via lpi-examdev < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Bryan Smith via lpi-examdev wrote: > > > > > So if we're going to drop BWT (bzip2), then let's nuke it all ... at > > least > > > for the kernel objective. Otherwise, we should expand beyond just LZ77 > > > (gzip) and BWT (bzip2), and put in the whole lot ... > > > - LZMA (xz) > > > and LZ77 alternatives to gzip, like ... > > > - LZO (lzop) > > > - LZ4 (p7z**) > > > > I don't think many people really care about the specific algorithms > behind > > the > > compression tools > > > That was my question. > I.e., I usually don't exactly have opinions, but questions based on, "Okay, > if we're going to do X, why not Y or Z?" > > I mean, if we're going to look at dropping one (e.g., BTW/bzip2), then why > not just remove it altogether? > Or at least reduce the value and questions to awareness only. > > (perhaps NIST does, but we here in Europe don't care that much about NIST). > > > > I was just pointing out that some (e.g., LZ4/p7z) have program that are > getting blacklisted by the US, which does affect some American allies as > well, and definitely American companies operating in Europe (and > elsewhere). > > Having said that, one observation we can make is that the compression tools > > pretty much all look and feel the same as far as their CLIs are > > concerned. If > > you have seen one, you have basically seen them all. I don't believe > there > > is > > a lot to be gained by arguing in detail about whether compression tool X, > > Y or > > Z should be “on the exam”; I would probably cover gzip in detail by way > of > > example and then tell people that there is a bunch of others with > > different > > performance characteristics that are all operated along the same general > > principles. Since there seems to be a new one every other month we would > > otherwise be playing eternal catch-up. > > > > Indeed. LZ77 (Gzip) only and then just awareness there are other options? > > I would probably be reluctant to add containerisation to the LPIC-2 exam – > > I > > agree with Fabian's comments about scope creep. It is probably best left > > in > > the DevOps area for now. > > > > And yet ... senior sysadmins will run into containers running on systems. > Should it not be awareness at some point? I think LPIC-1 will eventually > be unable to avoid the awareness level at some point.** > > - bjs > > **P.S. We're at the point in my current environment where we're pushing > out Containers to run under WSL2, including using Ansible playbooks to > configure/manage them. But WSL2 isn't on the exam, of course. > > -- > Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith > E-mail: b.j.smith at ieee.org or me at bjsmith.me > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/private/lpi-examdev/attachments/20220220/c7321da8/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > > ------------------------------ > > End of lpi-examdev Digest, Vol 150, Issue 11 > ******************************************** >
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
