On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Chuck Mead wrote:
> DDWD>Then we need tos tart actually writing questions on the 2 different
> DDWD>versions. But I'd be loathe to write questions about the kernels
> DDWD>without some sort of new review from poeple. I want to know
> DDWD>SPECIFICLY what folks think admins should know and not just
> DDWD>compilation and installation. Do they want to know what feture
> DDWD>groups need to be in the kernel in order for a specific function to
> DDWD>work or why not to compile certain peices of code as modules?
> I have been thinking for some time that we may need to do a Job Analysis
> Survey for L1. Tom what do you think?
No, I do not think so.
- It is not that hard to find out what in our objectives has become
outdated, and what is current in Linux distributions.
- Borderline cases have been included in the JAS-2, and some tasks have
been submitted for inclusion into L1.
- This would have been timely 3 or 4 months ago. We are already well
under way for the revision, 6 weeks behind schedule, and I really think we
should not make more delays.
--
Tom Peters
Director of the Board & Exam Development Specialist,
Linux Professional Institute
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
