Dear Kara, Is there an agreed time limit on LPI coverage of legacy systems? What will be in use and be seen by a jr sysadmin in mid-2002 (after this exam comes out)? I'm suggesting that a system or even a legacy app designed to the 2.0.x kernel (and perhaps the older 2.2.x kernels) will be far less common - and generally the province of more senior admins.
Thanks, Michael > I beleive you are correct. But, should jr admins be prepared to deal with > "legacy" systems which may have these limitations still? If so, > understanding these concepts is still relevant and should still be > included. An example may be a system in a factory with an internally > proprietary program running. The internal program may have been written > specific to kernel 2.0 or maybe 2.2. The Jr admin was sent out to upgrade > memory on the (hopefully standalone for security purposes) machine, but it > only is seeing 64 of the 128 installed... > -- This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list. Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to leave the list.
