On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 03:11, Les Bell wrote: > Oh, no doubts about its pedigree - only how widely implemented it is. And > will be, in the timeframe of this exam. At some point, someone will have to > draw line, and above it will be those things we can reasonably expect a > competent candidate to know and use. Should the interaction between Samba > ACL's and XFS ACL's be above the line, or below? Especially since our > filesystem security tasks make no mention of attributes or ACL's at all. . > .
Ext3 and XFS act the _exact_same_ from the standpoint of set/getacls, Samba configuration, etc... That was the whole point of the 2.5.3+ standardization, which as been backported to 2.4 and supported by both Ext3 and XFS. -- Bryan J. Smith, E.I. -- Engineer, Technologist, School Teacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
