[lpi-examdev] Re: Review comments

[Scott Lamberton]

If Lea wants she can just receive monthly digests (I think that is what 
she means by end summary).  I�m in meetings all day tomorrow so I�ll 
subscribe her over the weekend and see if she has the ability to chose 
that herself (I�m not totally familiar with mailman--Charles???) -- 
unless otherwise indicated I�ll make that selection for her.

BTW both D.Edwards and Stacy should have that ability as well if Lea 
requests subscription.  Should I be making someone else moderator of 
this list?

What about tool-dev for Lea?
scott
Tabatha Marshall wrote:
Lea,
Scott is referring to the LPI-Examdev mailing list.  I do believe it
would be a good idea to add you to the list, given that we need your
input to streamline the translation process and fit it into the review
cycle. :D
Scott--would you be so kind as to do that?  This will make it much
easier for Lea to be included in the discussions.
Thanks!
Tab

On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 17:45, Lea Fields wrote:
 

Hi Tabatha,
I'm not sure what list Scott is referring to, is it an on-going list?
If possible, I'd like to have the end summary.  If you think I can add
value, feel free to keep me in the current thread.  If it's just a
matter of letting me know the end result, I'm fine with that, too!
Thanks,
Lea Fields 
Senior Project Manager 
Lionbridge Technologies
Phone:  508-960-2210 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lamberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: G. Matthew Rice; Charles Galpin; Sandra Dolan; Lea Fields; Torsten
Scheck; Richard Dice; Stacy Gildenston; Glenn McKnight; LPI Examdev
Subject: Re: Review comments

Tabatha:
All of those people on your cc list are on the examdev list with the
exception of glenn (I'm not sure about lea fields).  If you want Lea
subscribed let me know.  But with Glenn, I can tell you his emails run
into the hundreds--he'll be leaving this stuff to the rest of the fine
people you have on this thread ;-)
scott
Tabatha Marshall wrote:
   

On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 16:25, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
     

I agree.  This should move to examdev.
Tabatha Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  

       

Ouch!  I think I'll need input from Lea and Sandy here.  The list 
below shows totals dating all the way back to January 2000, and I'm 
pretty sure we aren't looking to that far back, though I'd rather one
         

of them confirm for us.
    

         

I'm sure that it would be most useful to work backwards and stop when 
they get too repetitive.  Or at the last exam revision date.  
Whichever comes first :)
  

       

Okay, so can anyone tell me when the last exam revision happened?  This
     

will help us extract the right amount of comments.  The main goal there
     

is to sort and forward the appropriate comments to Lea as soon as 
possible so any final language issues can be addressed.

     

Not sure what t7e is, but yes, I like that plan!
    

         

I would be more interested having this going into a language specific 
support/helpdesk queue with 'thank you for you comments' auto
       

responses.
   

That's assuming that the affiliates can help [or be required to help] 
or something?  I'm CC'ing the affilitate guys [is it scott or glenn?] 
on this for their feedback.

translation would be nice but if all of the comments amount to 'the 
question on mount is wrong', it would be nicer to have canned 
responses saying thank you for the comment, this error has been 
corrected.  And not translate the same comments repeatedly.
  

       

I showed Taki the second link I got from you yesterday during our chat 
and he said he'd follow up with Charles.  Though I've only seen 
screenshots and a product description, it sounds it could be just the 
tool to get the job done.

Tab
Note: cc to LPI-Examdev

     


_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev