Timo Dotzauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that use of "route" for static routes is a Level 1 > Item. So I a Level Admin should be able to configure dynamic > route. So IPv6 was developed for huge networks and huge > networks use dynamic routing.
Umm, this is _not_ what I'm referring to at all. Furthermore, we need more people to understand IPv6, not assume it's about global address space. Heck, I would argue that's 90% of the problem with its misunderstanding. It's not even a static v. dynamic issue. That's more netadmin anyway. I'm just talking about understanding what the heck the difference is between the LINKLOCAL and Routed Subnet IPv6 addresses. I guess I'm talking to people who don't know. Hence the continues "problem" here. ;-> > Parallel to this discussion, I open a new discussion at the > lpi-de list. I will report the feedback. Thanx. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers) _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
