> Subject: Re: More libata
> 
> Ian Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I think that this is a reasonable forum for discussing exam > 
> > objectives and the > > concept of drivers, libata for example, is 
> > reasonable.  The > question is, for > > what exam?
> > > > Should libata be part of the LPI 101 exam, and therefore part of the
> > > exam objectives?  If so, is it too late to get it inserted into 
> > the > new exam objectives?
> >
> > The IBM developerWorks tutorial (
> > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/lpi/) for topic 101 needs 
> > updating. It's on my list of things to do.
> 
> Ian, I know that you are coming to LW next week.  We could discuss this live.
> 
> There is a technical advisory committee meeting on the wednesday (I believe).
> Can you make that?
> 
> Also, is anyone else on the list coming to LWSF?  You're all invited to the
> TAC meeting :)
> 

Ian and others reading this,
http://lwn.net/Articles/290743/

Although the LWSF TAC has already finished as of this writing --- 14:40 PST 
Wednesday, August 6th, 2008 ---
James Stanger is scheduled to run tonight's very-relevant BoF, entitled  'Why 
Don't More Educators Know About Open Source and Linux'.
Would perhaps further discussion of libata best proceed or follow this session 
for those who wish to participate in this, and are also able to??
Here is the LinuxWorld Showguide description:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BoF15: 'Why Don't More Educators Know About Open Source and Linux'
6:00 pm - 7:00 pm
James Stanger, Chief Certification Architect and VP of Certification, CIW
Moscone Convention Center Room 306

While there are notable open-source supporters in universities,
the majority of people who spend the most time with students
don't know much about open source. This is a serious problem.
These institutions teach the majority of students who will
become tomorrow's IT leaders. Yet they're being educated in
Microsoft, Oracle, Adobe, and Cisco almost exclusively.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-aaron
--
acohen36's Universal Recursion Postulate:
"There exists at least one subatomic particle in our Universe which CONTAINS at 
least one non-self subatomic particle."


=
Geographic Rights Managment
Secure online content and streaming distribution with IP Intelligence.
http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?redirectid=3a4f1d616a4dc6854e59b7502197886f


-- 
Powered by Outblaze
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
lpi-examdev@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to