I don't think the 'T' adds anything useful. The current system seems to work OK for us at IBM developerWorks ( http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-lpic1-v3-map/index.html ). It would be work for us to change, but not monumental, since we're only online, not print.
Ian Shields Ph.D. Linux Technologist, ISV & Developer Relations IBM Corp Research Triangle Park, NC ishie...@us.ibm.com lpi-examdev-boun...@lpi.org wrote on 12/22/2010 12:16:08 PM: > From: "G. Matthew Rice" <m...@starnix.com> > To: "This is the lpi-examdev mailing list." <lpi-examdev@lpi.org> > Date: 12/22/2010 12:16 PM > Subject: [lpi-examdev] administrivia: Objective numbering > Sent by: lpi-examdev-boun...@lpi.org > > Hi guys, > > Some people have brought up the fact that our exams are numbered like > '101', '102', '201', ... > While the topics (a set of objectives) are also numbered similarly. > For an example, see: > > http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-1_Objectives > > A radical change to this numbering would make a lot of training > material and books confusing so I was thinking of something simple > (yet obvious) in the objective numbering. > > Maybe something like 'T101' for Topic 101. > > Anyone want to suggest an alternative? Let's not make this a bike > shed discussion, though :) > > Regards, > -- > G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> gpg id: EF9AAD20 > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > lpi-examdev@lpi.org > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
