G. Matthew Rice wrote:

> (OT: Does anyone think that
> building packages is appropriate LPIC-2 material?)

It used to be in there but then at some point we got rid of it.

I'm in two minds about this. I can't speak for the RPM side of things, but as 
far as Debian-style packages are concerned, there are now so many competing 
ways of actually making packages that it would be difficult to figure out what 
to concentrate on for the purposes of the exam. These days, few if any people 
use the low-level tools directly; instead there are various frameworks at 
different levels of abstraction that will deal with many of the issues one 
comes across when preparing packages.

On an abstract level, it behooves an administrator of Debian-style systems to 
put their own software into packages just for the sake of neatness. In actual 
practice, relatively few people will actually go to the trouble. One might 
argue that by requiring package-building knowledge in LPIC-2, LPI would do 
system administrators a favour since, having studied package building for 
their exams, they would presumably consider it less of a nuisance to actually 
build packages out of their own software in »real life«.

On the other hand, this would amount to LPI dictating policy to system 
administrators via the exam, which I would think is not what the exam is for – 
the exam should follow »best practices«, not try to force them where they 
don't actually exist in the field. LPI's method of arriving at exam contents 
seems to suggest that if package building doesn't show up to an appreciable 
degree in the JTA, LPI has no business sticking it in just because we like the 
idea.

Anselm
-- 
Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen
[email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de
Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany
Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev

Reply via email to